Volume 8, Issue 1, March 2020, Page: 1-5
Yield Performance of Improved Tomato (Lycopersiconesculentum Mill.) Varieties at West Shoa Zone, Ethiopia
Chala Begna Bedassa, Department of Horticulture, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia
Bikila Olika Fufa, Department of Horticulture, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia
Mosisa Chewaka Aga, Department of Horticulture, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia
Received: Sep. 24, 2019;       Accepted: Nov. 4, 2019;       Published: Apr. 14, 2020
DOI: 10.11648/j.abb.20200801.11      View  156      Downloads  49
Abstract
Tomato (Lycopersiconesculentu Mill.) belongs to the family Solanaceae and is one of the most popular, important edible and nutritious vegetable crops in the world. Most parts of the world produce and consume tomato from the home gardens and greenhouse to the larger commercial farms as it is able to various agro ecological conditions. The promising growth performance and high yield of tomato depends on the selection of appropriate varieties for a particular location. A field experiment with the objective of evaluating the adaptability and yield performance of improved tomato varieties was conducted at Ambo and Toke kutaye districts of west Shoa zone during 2017 and 2018 growing seasons. Six tomato varieties namely Cochoro, Fetan, Chali, Melka shola, ARP tomato d2 and Melka salsa were evaluated for adaptability and yield performance. Data were recorded on growth and yield contributing parameters like plant height, canopy diameter, and primary branches plant-1, number of cluster plant-1, number of fruits cluster-1, unmarketable and marketable yield. The study showed that there was difference in growth and yield of tomato among different varieties while non-significant result was observed between the two locations. After two years evaluation, the longest plant height (50.7cm), number of primary branches (10.84), number of cluster plant-1 (17.92), number of fruit cluster-1 (32.6), and marketable yield (27.12 ton ha-1) were recorded in tomato variety ARP tomato d2 at Ambo and Toke Kutayedistricts. Therefore, variety ARP tomato d2 is promising variety in providing high yield for the test sites.
Keywords
Adaptation, Tomato, Variety, Yield Performance
To cite this article
Chala Begna Bedassa, Bikila Olika Fufa, Mosisa Chewaka Aga, Yield Performance of Improved Tomato (Lycopersiconesculentum Mill.) Varieties at West Shoa Zone, Ethiopia, Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering. Vol. 8, No. 1, 2020, pp. 1-5. doi: 10.11648/j.abb.20200801.11
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Meseret, D., Ali, M., & Kassahun, B. (2012). Evaluation of Tomato (Lycopersiconesculentum Mill.) Genotypes for Yield and Yield Components. The African Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology, 6 (special issue 1), 45–49.
[2]
Asfaw, Z. and Eshetu, D. 2015. Production and management of major vegetable crops in Ethiopia, December 2015, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Ethiopian Institute of Agricultaral Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; KOPIA Ethiopia Centre, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Printed at Eth-Cana Press 149 pages Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. ISBN: 978-99944-66-25-2.
[3]
Naika, S., J. V. L. de Jeude, M. de Goffau, M. Hilmi and B. V. Dam. 2000. Cultivation of tomato. Production, processing and marketing, Agromisa/CTA. Revised edition.
[4]
Agyeman., K, I. Osei-Bosu, J. N. Berchie, M. K. Osei, M. B. Mochiah, J. N. Lamptey, O. Kingsley and G. Arku. 2012. Effect of poultry manure and different combinations of inorganic fertilizers on growth and yield of four tomato varieties in Ghana, Agric. Sci. J, 2 (4): 27-34.
[5]
FAO, 2006. FAO Production Yearbook, Basic data Unit, Statistics Division, FAO, Rome, Italy, No. 55, pp 125-127.
[6]
FAOSTAT, 2010. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available http://faostat.fao.org. Accessed July/ 26/2011.
[7]
Kitila M., Belew D., Mohammed A., and Getachew Y., 2012. Effect of intra-row spacing and variety on fruit yield and quality of fresh market tomato (Lycopersiconesculentum Mill.) under Jimma condition, Ethiopia. Ethiop. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. Vol. 3 (1): 32-42.
[8]
FAOSTAT. 2011. Statistical Database of the Food and Agriculture of the United Nations. FAO, Rome, Italy. (http://faostat.fao.org/site/612/default.aspx#ancor).
[9]
Lemma D. 2003. Tomatoes Research Experience and Production Prospects. Research Report No. 43. Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization, Addis Ababa, 1 (33): 46.
[10]
Iqbal, M., M. Niamatullah, I. Yousaf, M. Munir and M. Z. Khan. 2012. Effect of nitrogen and potassium on growth, economical yield components of tomato. Sarhad J. Agric, 27 (4): 545-548.
[11]
Hanson, P., J. T. Chen, C. G. Kuo, R. Morris and R. T. Opena. 2000. Suggested cultural practices for tomato. International cooperator Guide.
[12]
Patel, J. S, Sitapara, H. H, Patel K. A. Influence of plant growth regulators on growth, yield and quality of tomatoand brinjal. International Journal of Forestry and Crop Improvement. 2012; 3 (2): 116-118
[13]
Yeshiwas, Y, Belew, D, and Tolessa, K., 2016. Tomato (Solanumlycopersicum L.) Yield and Fruit Quality Attributes as Affected by Varieties and Growth Conditions, World J. of Agri. Sci. 12 (6): 404-408.
[14]
Asnakew W., 1988. Physical Properties of Ethiopian VertisolsIn Management of Sub-Saharan Africa (eds. Jutzi, S. C., Haque, I., Mclntire, J. and Stares, J. E. S.). Pp. 111-123.
[15]
Balemi, T. (2015). Effect of integrated use of cattle manure and inorganic fertilizers on tuber yield of potato in Ethiopia Effect of integrated use of cattle manure and inorganic fertilizers on tuber yield of potato in Ethiopia. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 12 (2), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162012000200005
[16]
MOA 1998-2014. Crop Variety Registry. Animal and plant Health Regulatory Directorate. Issue No. 3-17. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
[17]
Kallo, G., Chaurasia, S. N. G., Major, S. and Singh, M. 1998. Stability analysis in tomato. Vegetable Science 25 (1): 81-84.
[18]
Manoj, R. and Raghav, M. 1998. Performance of F1 hybrids and high yielding varieties of tomato under mid-west plains of Uttar Pradesh. Progressive Horticulture 30 (3): 194-197.
[19]
Naika, S., de Jeude, J. V. L., de Goffau, M., Hilmi, M., & van Dam, B. 2005. Cultivation of tomato. Didigrafi Publishing. Netherlands. pp. 34-57.
[20]
Sharma, S. K. and K. B. Rastogi. 1993. Evaluation of some tomato cultivars for seed production under mid hill conditions of Himachal Pardesh. Annals of Agri. Res. India. 14 (4): 494-496.
[21]
Fayaz, O. K, S. S, A H and S. A. (2007) Performance evaluation of tomato cultivars at high altitude. Sarhad J. Agric. Vol. 23, No. 3.
[22]
Khan, Sajid, N. H. Khan, I. Hussain, Ziaullah, N. Naeem and J. Rahman. 2016. Adaptability of tomato advance lines in temperate climate. Int. J. Agric. Environ. Res., 2 (2): 156-161.
[23]
El-Amin, S. M and R. B. M. Ali., 2012. Overcoming seasonality in tropics by growing tomato varieties under cooled condition. J. Agric. Sci, 3 (4): 602-607.
Browse journals by subject